Glossary

Written information security program: definition for WISP compliance

A written information security program is the documented set of administrative, technical, and physical safeguards used to protect customer information. The document has to describe real controls and remediation steps, not just a policy promise. 16 CFR 314.3(a) requires a financial institution to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program.

Key facts

  • A written information security program is the documented set of administrative, technical, and physical safeguards used to protect customer information.
  • The document has to describe real controls and remediation steps, not just a policy promise.
  • The term should be used consistently in the WISP, incident response plan, and access control policy.

Key takeaways

  • A written information security program is the documented set of administrative, technical, and physical safeguards used to protect customer information.
  • The document has to describe real controls and remediation steps, not just a policy promise.
  • The term should be used consistently in the WISP, incident response plan, and access control policy.
  • Definitions are operational: they should help a small firm decide what to do and what evidence to keep.

What does written information security program mean?

A written information security program is the documented set of administrative, technical, and physical safeguards used to protect customer information.

The document has to describe real controls and remediation steps, not just a policy promise.

16 CFR 314.3(a) requires a financial institution to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program.

Worked example

A small broker's WISP names the Qualified Individual, borrower data locations, MFA status, vendor contracts, disposal process, incident workflow, review cadence, and dated remediation steps.

The example belongs in the policy packet only if it matches the firm's actual systems, vendors, and evidence records. Otherwise, it should become a remediation or counsel-review note.

What small firms get wrong

The common failure is treating the WISP as a generic promise instead of a record of real systems, users, vendors, safeguards, and gaps.

The fix is to tie the term to a concrete record: a system inventory, access list, vendor list, incident log, training record, or dated control screenshot.

Written information security program in context
Where it appearsWhy it mattersProof example
WISP16 CFR 314.3(a) requires a financial institution to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program.Annual review record
Access Control PolicyConnects roles to permissionsUser access list
Incident Response PlanGuides escalation and notice decisionsIncident log

FAQ

Is this legal advice?

No. Policywright is a configurable template product, not a law firm and not legal advice. A qualified lawyer should review state-law reliance or breach-notification decisions.

Does a small firm still need a written plan?

Yes. The Safeguards Rule requires a written information security program for covered financial institutions, and IRS guidance tells paid tax preparers to maintain a written data security plan.

What if a control is not in place yet?

A serious WISP should not pretend. It should identify the gap, assign an owner, set a target date, and preserve a dated remediation record.

Sources

Turn definitions into working policies.

Policywright uses clear terms and source-cited clauses across the full policy packet.

See a sample
Policywright is a configurable template product, not a law firm and not legal advice. State breach deadlines and legal reliance should be reviewed with qualified counsel before launch or use.