State WISP guide

WISP requirements for tax preparers in Connecticut

If your firm prepares tax returns or handles customer financial information in Connecticut, the written plan itself is federal. 16 CFR 314.3(a) requires a comprehensive information security program written in one or more readily accessible parts, and it has no small-firm exemption. Connecticut does not issue its own WISP. What Connecticut adds is a breach-notification layer that decides who you have to tell, and how fast, if customer information gets out.

Key facts

  • The WISP itself is required of Connecticut firms at any size: 16 CFR 314.3(a) has no consumer-count exemption.
  • Under 5,000 consumers, 16 CFR 314.6 does lift four duties, including the written incident response plan at 314.4(h). It does not lift the plan.
  • Resident notice without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery of the breach, unless a shorter federal deadline applies; Attorney General notice no later than resident notice, with law-enforcement delay available.

Key takeaways

  • Notify the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General no later than the time affected residents are notified; initial reports should use the online submission form, while updates or supplemental reports should be sent to ag.breach@ct.gov with the case number when available.
  • The WISP should preserve evidence, remediation steps, and annual review records.

Do Connecticut tax preparers need a WISP?

Yes, if they are covered by the FTC Safeguards Rule or IRS tax-data security expectations, they should maintain a written plan. Connecticut state breach-notice duties make incident planning especially important.

The WISP should start with federal obligations because the Safeguards Rule supplies the security-program structure.

Connecticut requires notice to the Office of the Attorney General no later than when residents are notified, and the Attorney General prefers initial reports through its online data-breach submission form.

What is specific to Connecticut?

Resident notice without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery of the breach, unless a shorter federal deadline applies; Attorney General notice no later than resident notice, with law-enforcement delay available. The plan should identify who evaluates state notice, who contacts counsel, and where the decision record is kept.

Connecticut’s 60-day outer deadline is paired with a hard Attorney General reporting workflow and a special remedy for Social Security or Taxpayer Identification Number exposure. A Connecticut incident file should preserve discovery date, resident-notice date, AG confirmation and PR case number, any federal shorter-deadline analysis, and the 24-month credit-monitoring offer decision.

State breach-notification law does not replace the Safeguards Rule. It adds a state-specific response layer when an incident affects Connecticut residents.

Connecticut residents whose personal information is believed to have been compromised in a breach of security involving computerized data containing personal information.

Notify the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General no later than the time affected residents are notified; initial reports should use the online submission form, while updates or supplemental reports should be sent to ag.breach@ct.gov with the case number when available.

What should the WISP say?

It should describe real safeguards, assign responsibility, map vendors and systems, and include an incident-response path that reaches state-law review quickly.

For a small firm, the strongest plan is plain and evidence-backed: MFA records, backup tests, access reviews, training, vendor lists, and remediation dates.

The plan should never promise a control that is not actually in place.

Connecticut state-aware WISP checklist
TopicConnecticut planning noteEvidence
Federal WISPUse 16 CFR Part 314 as the program backboneWISP and annual review
IRS tax dataAccount for taxpayer records, PTIN practice, portals, and e-file workflowsSystem inventory and access list
Breach noticeResident notice without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery of the breach, unless a shorter federal deadline applies; Attorney General notice no later than resident notice, with law-enforcement delay available.Incident clock and counsel review record
Regulator pathNotify the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General no later than the time affected residents are notified; initial reports should use the online submission form, while updates or supplemental reports should be sent to ag.breach@ct.gov with the case number when available.Notification decision log
State statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 36a-701bSource URL retained in page sources

FAQ

Is this legal advice?

No. Policywright is a documentation product, not a law firm, and nothing here is legal advice. A qualified lawyer should review state-law reliance or breach-notification decisions.

Does a small firm still need a written plan?

Yes. The Safeguards Rule requires a written information security program for covered financial institutions, and IRS guidance tells paid tax preparers to maintain a written data security plan.

What if a control is not in place yet?

A serious WISP should not pretend. It should identify the gap, assign an owner, set a target date, and preserve a dated remediation record.

Does Connecticut have its own WISP law?

This page does not claim a standalone Connecticut WISP statute for every firm. It explains how federal WISP duties should be paired with Connecticut breach-notification planning.

Who reviews Connecticut breach notice?

The incident plan should route state-law decisions through qualified counsel and preserve any Connecticut Office of the Attorney General regulator-notice analysis.

Sources

Build a Connecticut-aware WISP packet.

Policywright generates a source-cited WISP and incident response plan you can review with counsel.

Start the questionnaire
Policywright is a documentation product, not a law firm, and nothing here is legal advice. State breach deadlines and legal reliance should be reviewed with qualified counsel before launch or use.