Statute citationFla. Stat. § 501.171
Notification deadlineIndividual notice no later than 30 days after determination or reason to believe a breach occurred, subject to law-enforcement delay or waiver; Department notice for 500+ individuals no later than 30 days, with a possible 15-day good-cause extension.
Who must be notifiedIndividuals in Florida whose personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, accessed as a result of the breach, unless a documented no-harm determination applies. Notify the Florida Department of Legal Affairs for any breach affecting 500 or more individuals in Florida.
Consumer-reporting-agency thresholdFlorida requires notice to nationwide consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay when more than 1,000 individuals are notified at one time.
Consumer-notice triggerFlorida requires notice to the Department of Legal Affairs for breaches affecting 500 or more individuals in Florida, and the statute allows a 15-day extension for good cause if requested in writing within 30 days.
Florida breach notification fields
FieldVerified valueUse in the incident file
StatuteFla. Stat. § 501.171Link the decision record to the official citation
DeadlineIndividual notice no later than 30 days after determination or reason to believe a breach occurred, subject to law-enforcement delay or waiver; Department notice for 500+ individuals no later than 30 days, with a possible 15-day good-cause extension.Sort multi-state response work by the shortest stated clock
ResidentsIndividuals in Florida whose personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, accessed as a result of the breach, unless a documented no-harm determination applies.Identify whether affected residents receive notice
RegulatorNotify the Florida Department of Legal Affairs for any breach affecting 500 or more individuals in Florida.Record AG or regulator portal review
Consumer-reporting agenciesFlorida requires notice to nationwide consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay when more than 1,000 individuals are notified at one time.Check whether the affected count crosses a CRA threshold
Consumer triggerFlorida requires notice to the Department of Legal Affairs for breaches affecting 500 or more individuals in Florida, and the statute allows a 15-day extension for good cause if requested in writing within 30 days.Tie notice analysis to the statutory trigger, not an unsupported assumption

What this state lookup shows

Florida fields are rendered from the verified state dataset only when the field exists. No deadline is inferred when the data does not state one.

Fla. Stat. § 501.171 is the statute citation retained for this lookup, and the state page links to the official statute source when available.

Florida requires notice to the Department of Legal Affairs for breaches affecting 500 or more individuals in Florida, and the statute allows a 15-day extension for good cause if requested in writing within 30 days. The consumer trigger matters because the clock usually starts only after a legally meaningful incident analysis, not merely because an IT alert appeared.

The last verified date for this Florida lookup is 2026-08-12. Use that date as a prompt to refresh counsel review before making a live notification decision.

How to use it during an incident

Start with containment and evidence preservation, then identify affected resident states and compare the shortest stated deadline first.

A practical incident file should record discovery time, encryption status, systems involved, affected consumer count, vendor involvement, and the person responsible for counsel review.

For Florida, the WISP should say where the notification decision log lives, who contacts counsel, who checks the regulator portal, and who approves any consumer notice before it is sent.

This lookup pairs with the Incident Response Plan because the plan owns the workflow: intake, escalation, containment, preservation, notice analysis, communications, and final review.

How it fits the WISP

A WISP should not guess at state-law outcomes; it should make the breach-review path fast, documented, and source-linked.

Pair this lookup with the Florida WISP requirements page so the firm's written program names the state-aware incident path before an event happens.

Policywright keeps the breach clock separate from the policy packet: the lookup tells you what to review, while the generated packet assigns owners, evidence records, remediation steps, and review cadence.

Not legal advice. A qualified lawyer should confirm whether the incident facts meet a statutory definition, whether substitute notice or regulator notice applies, and whether another state or federal rule changes the timeline.

FAQ

Is this Florida lookup legal advice?

No. It is a source-linked lookup for incident planning and should be reviewed with qualified counsel before relying on it in a live notification decision.

What if affected residents live outside Florida?

Use the multi-state lookup page and include every state where affected residents may live. The comparison table sorts selected states by the shortest stated deadline first.

Does this replace the FTC Safeguards Rule notice analysis?

No. State notice review is separate from the federal Safeguards Rule and 16 CFR 314.4(j) analysis. A serious incident file should preserve both review tracks.

Sources

This tells you the clock.

Policywright writes the plan that starts it.

Build the plan
Policywright is a configurable template product, not a law firm and not legal advice. State breach deadlines and legal reliance should be reviewed with qualified counsel before launch or use.